Friday, August 20, 2010

A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party and Evil of Sharia Law

A Mad Hatter’s Tea Party and Evil of Sharia Law

Burn the Wife Alive was discouraged by Islam. Islam also openly and strongly discouraged the barbaric process of burying baby daughter alive!

Judaism and Christianity got at least 18 provisions allowing stone to death.

Non Muslim St. Stephen was stoned to death!

The other reporting of Sunkara Srinivas, 32, belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC), and 22-year-old Swapna Reddy, belonging to an upper caste, had eloped and married six months ago was in HYDERABAD, India and both of them were NOT Muslims.

The only other story I found is Stoning of Du'a Khalil Aswad. She is not a Muslim!! In fact she belongs to Yazidi faith!!!

Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran is one case only and I am conducting more investigation about it. Adulterer Stoned to Death: Extreme Islamic Punishment in Somalia is another case in point one. Since 1980, thanks to US government, Somalia is lacking of a proper government and the case is very questionable.

The most disturbing reported cases of stone to death are:

1. Pakistani man stoned to death and

2. Man and woman stoned to death in Afghanistan!

Amongst 1.5 billion Muslims not even a handful of Muslims faced stone to death! Sudden three reporting in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran are seriously disturbing.

I hope they are not like Hill & Knowlton trained Nurse Nayirah and Saddam Hussein's alleged shredder from totally misguided American mercenaries who are stupid enough to send their own children to die for the mistress called Israel.

Stoned To Death! Good or Bed?

For more: Stoned To Death! Good or Bed?

Further to Burn the Wife Alive I am having lots of laugh at your expense! You are an open minded and fair person. You and I hear many things including Hill & Knowlton trained Nurse Nayirah and Saddam Hussein's alleged shredder from totally misguided American mercenaries who are stupid enough to send their own children to die for the mistress called Israel.

Like you I am for everyone’s right. However, please give me the statistics in support of those false and ill motivated claims!

Please remember and read Revealing the real agenda of the Time journalist on Afghanistan before saving anyone!

By the way, I won’t bother to add the list of men and women including children executed in USA through lethal injection, electrocution and all other means!!

--- In, "Jodie" wrote:

Re: Stoned to Death! Is It Wonderful?

Hey!! Maybe you would like some Stones thrown at you!!!!!!!!

That is called the "Stone Age."

I am for Women's Rights... Equal Rights for Women throughout the world!! Isn't it about time for countries in the ME to create laws for Women's Rights???

This is the second time I can remember of Iran crucifying a woman. I recall a number of years ago a young girl was hung for adultery in Iran. Now this married woman has been found guilty and will be sentenced to die in some fashion, probably hanging.

Why can't Middle Easterners just call it a day and get a divorce??????? Why must the men (??) kill the wife in such matters... ?? Especially when the man has had countless women to use and commit adultery??

Are the EGOs of Middle Eastern men that weak??? I really do question the psyches of ME men. They do "weird" things... things that are thought of as "abnormal" behaviors in other societies/countries. I am glad that I live in the USA and had a very kind and gentle father and husband.


--- In, "Biplobi Faruque" wrote:

Stoned to Death! Is It Wonderful?

People should kick big-mouthed American leaders and media barons in the BUTT! Let people of the world throw some stones at them!!

I have started this project. I would like to know correct facts and figures.

How many people were stoned to death in the world? I also would like to know their;

1. Nationality.

2. Religion.

3. Sex.

Come on let’s find put the facts and figures before venting futile emotional jingoistic militarism!

--- In, "Jodie" wrote:

Re: Stoned to Death! Is It Wonderful?

As a Muslim, don't pretend that you know little of the punishment of "Stoning to Death." It was common in countries of the Middle East as punishment for crime for centuries. I have studied ancient history. People were not very smart or "cultured" then... and some still aren't!!

"Stoning" as a method of punishment is now considered Barbaric!! Surely you are aware of this...........

For a country like Iran that pretends it is progressing in world knowledge, communication, and leadership to use such ancient and barbaric methods of punishment is laughable... (if it were not so tragic for the victim).

Someone needs to kick that little short-assed, big-mouthed Iranian leader Ahmadinejad in the BUTT!! Let Israel throw some stones at him!!!!!!!!

I would laugh!!


--- In, "arab_semite@..." <arab_semite@...> wrote:

Stoned to Death! Is It Wonderful?

For more: Stoned to Death! Is It Wonderful?

Yahoo Q and A

My inquiry concerning Names of Muslims Women Stoned to death resulted in zero!

I don't know if the Muslims are responsible for The Stoning of St. Stephen. - Public Domain

Stoning as punishment was prescribed for 18 crimes in Judaism, but since 30 CE, the Sanhedrin effectively abolished capital punishment. Stoning continues to be used with and without legal proceedings in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and other countries, all of which justify the practice with Islam. International human rights groups like Amnesty International have spoken out against the practice.

The only story I found is Stoning of Du'a Khalil Aswad. She is not a Muslim!! In fact she belongs to Yazidi faith!!!

The other reporting of Sunkara Srinivas, 32, belonging to the Scheduled Caste (SC), and 22-year-old Swapna Reddy, belonging to an upper caste, had eloped and married six months ago was in HYDERABAD, India and both of them were NOT Muslims.

Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran is one case only. Adulterer Stoned to Death: Extreme Islamic Punishment in Somalia is another one.

Anyway, let's find out how many people were stoned to death in which countries, when, why and what were their religions.

Let's talk with facts. No emotion. No prejudice and bigotry.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Aussies remain in Israeli detention

Further to Sydney Zio-Nazis Murdering the Truth the following Yahoo report will expose lies of modern day Joseph Goebbels Rupert Murdoch’s Julius Streicher and Israetards, Israeo-Nazis and Zio-Nazis.

Faruque Ahmed


Free Australia Now, Mobile: 041 091 4118

Aussies remain in Israeli detention

AAP June 1, 2010, 8:00 pm

One Australian has been wounded in a deadly commando raid on ships  taking aid to the Gaza Strip.

AFP © Enlarge photo

One Australian has been shot and four more are in Israeli detention after they were caught in a deadly clash over a humanitarian mission bound for Gaza.

The Australians were on board an aid flotilla trying to reach the Palestinian territory.

Nine people died when Israeli forces stormed the ships, sparking international condemnation. A 20-year-old Australian man has undergone surgery after being shot in the leg.

The incident has added further strain to the troubled relationship between Australia and Israel.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd spoke out against the violence and loss of life.

"The Australian government condemns any use of violence under the sorts of circumstances that we have seen," he told reporters in Canberra.

"Furthermore, we are deeply concerned about the loss of life which has occurred."

Mr Rudd called for Israel's blockade of Gaza to end.

Australia and Israel's usually cordial relations have become troubled with the attack on the aid convoy coming soon after the federal government expelled an Israeli diplomat.

The expulsion was in retaliation for Israel's use of forged Australian passports in an assassination in Dubai.

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith also deplored the flotilla incident, describing it as "terrible and shocking" in a speech to parliament.

"I think very many Australians will be shocked by it," he said.

Australia called on Israel to conduct an independent inquiry into the incident straight away, and for that inquiry to be transparent.

The Australians in Israeli detention include two Fairfax reporters, Paul McGeough and Kate Geraghty.

They are understood to have refused an offer of deportation and are now in a detention centre at Beersheva. They have had their footage and equipment confiscated.

Peter Fray, editor of Fairfax's The Sydney Morning Herald, called on Israel to allow the reporters to tell their story.

Mr Fray said the reporters had "every right" to be on board the flotilla.

"We ask that Israel respect their right to do their jobs," he said.

The other detained Australians are two women who are understood to be unharmed.

Protests were held in Australian cities on Tuesday against Israel's actions. An estimated 4000 people stormed Sydney's Town Hall forecourt, chanting "Israel, USA, how many kids have you killed today?".

The crowd observed a minute's silence to remember the dead, standing by banners that read "Israel is a terrorist state".

In Canberra, about 120 protesters clasped candles and chanted in front of the Israeli embassy.

Palestinian flags were waved and some wore traditional scarves in a gesture of support.

The crowd heard that Israel had gone too far in attacking the convoy, and that the international community had to act swiftly or such actions would be repeated.

Protester Mahmoud Abujafar, who was born in the West Bank but lives in Canberra, said he had been feeling bad about the deaths all day.

"People came to help us, the people in Gaza, and they were killed," he told AAP.

He said he was feeling very proud of the Australians who had joined the aid flotilla.

Protesters chanted "free free Palestine" and "shame" as police guarded the gate to the embassy.

Earlier in the day, federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said the flotilla incident was "very distressing" and expressed his regret.

The opposition has not criticised Israel, saying more time is needed to sift through the differing claims about what happened.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

May the president please inform the committee

May the president please inform the committee

--- In, peesinbox@... wrote:

May the president please inform the committee on what the situation really is in regards to these perilous accusations, Am sure some of as have been waiting for some sought of an explanation in defense towards such brutal allegations and nothing as of yet, a response may have been unnecessary after faruque's posting, and understandably so with no disrespect to him but I thought it was consistent with his usual characteristics and hence shelved any concern whatsoever.

However, Ted is now alleging the same thing, and I quote Ted is alleging", so therefore it will seem careless and irresponsible on the part of the committee for these very serious claims to vanish without ample investigation which should be followed by a very tangible clarification of what has actually transpired.

Also if these allegations are found to be false the committee has to decide on some sought of a punitive measure which should then hopefully deter future aspirants in the category of making false allegations, however if it emerges that there is some truth in these allegations that should also be taking seriously by the committee in the same respect, because the presidency is what should be protected and no individual, all other battles personal chemical or nuclear should be fought outside NSWTDA battle fields, because I would imagine we have enough on our hands already in much more serious and worthwhile conflicts.

Furthermore, we should all refrain from employing these very detrimental tactics, there should be no place in the NSW TDA for such things, because I particularly have been silenced to a degree as a result of these concerns where am unable to fully say with confidence what I want to say for the fear of espionage because in such an environment with all the almost daily fracas it quiet hard to work out who work for who. We work with some serious organization's and it will be foolish to discount their power, and at the moment I need my license and do not want it tampered with because some of as don't have the capability to fight anything in the courts or the U.N.



Re: [NSWTDAEXEC] Reply to Ted's re; ratbag

Congratulations Trevor ,

you have retracted that false and highly misleading email of yours in which you wrongly claimed that the NSW TDA represented Plate Owners.

We do NOT !

The NSW TDA represents ONLY Bailee drivers, Lessee drivers and Owner drivers.

Through the Networks and CCN and the Taxi Council Ltd the Plate Owners/Investors are leeches that contribute nothing to the taxi industry and for years have screwed operators and drivers financially by unilaterally raising weekly lease fees whenever it suits them.

The NSW TDA opposes these leeches that screw drivers and operators.

Whereas the owner drivers that the NSW TDA represents also carry all the other costs of operating a taxi and doing the hard graft of running and driving a taxi.

With reference to the current very important debate (and test of the TDA !) concerning the new Gov’t Plate Leasing policy, Trevor originally claimed that :

“ Also we represent Bailees Lessees and Plate Owners, that is in the constitution too, and even on the Letterhead.”

Trevor now admits that

“I do take your semantic point, in that I could have used the Term, as quoted, `Owner Drivers' in the constitution.”

and states that

“ I dislike Investor Owners, and I would like speculators and investors to be taken out of the equation of the Taxi Industry.”

and that

“I started the NSWTDA to combat those very investors and leeches, … “

Well done, Trevor, in making a most fundamental correction !

BTW Trevor, there is no need to make an exception for the “inheritors, that is, widows of former working taxi drivers” who own a Plate. They are OK because they can sell the Plate and instead invest in property or shares or a bank deposit if they so wish, like everyone else lucky enough to have $400,000 of investment.



--- In, "princessannie" wrote:

To all committee members'

I am very disappointed to see personal attacks appearing on this Exec site. The whole idea of Exec is for committee members to communicate committee business in a confidential manner. It further disappoints me to hear non-committee persons (including non NSWTDA members) discussing posts that have been leaked from Exec. For these reasons I refuse to make further posts on this site untill such time as I am convinced that confidentiality and respect are restored.

It is also extremely sad for me to see our Secretary, Faruque, chooses to air his frustrations and personal convictions on the Exec site. Whilst there is absolutely no doubt that Faruque is a staunch fighter for Taxi reform his methods and mixed up ramblings do nothing to endear him to others. Many leaders in our industry consider him to be unapproachable, unstable and single minded. (in fact they often use more colourful words) They refuse to meet with him and ask that he not be brought to group discussions. Unfortunately his reputation is not helping the NSWTDA. However, having said that, I acknowledge that he was instrumental in having the recent plate issue turned into a Parliamentary inquiry. In the past I have supported Faruque, however I am not sure that I will do so in the future. His personal attacks on me make it extremely difficult to work with him. Perhaps his personal convictions and talents would be better suited to a position other than Secretary. This issue must be addressed at the earliest possible oportunity.

I also propose that our last committee meeting for the year be held on Wednesday 2nd. December 2009.


Trevor and Committee members,